Bushra Bibi Named in Eleven Cases Including GHQ Attack

PTBP Web Desk

The Rawalpindi police have presented comprehensive reports to the Islamabad High Court (IHC), naming Bushra Bibi, the wife of former Prime Minister Imran Khan, as a suspect in eleven cases. These cases include the attack on the General Headquarters (GHQ), highlighting a broad spectrum of serious allegations.

The reports were meticulously compiled and submitted by the Chief Police Officer (CPO) of Rawalpindi, detailing the various charges against Bushra Bibi. The Islamabad High Court session focused on the provision of case details against her, during which the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) prosecutor also submitted responses as ordered by the court.

The attack on the GHQ Gate 4. the burning of a sensitive military building in Saddar Cantt. attacks on intelligence agency offices on Murree Road. incidents of arson, rioting, and vandalism in various areas.

These charges are distributed across multiple police stations, such as RA Bazaar, Civil Line, New Town, City, Waris Khan, and Taxila.

In response to the court’s order, the NAB prosecutor revealed that four cases have been registered against Bushra Bibi with NAB—three in Rawalpindi and one in NAB Lahore. These cases pertain to allegations of corruption and other serious offenses, further complicating her legal situation.

While Rawalpindi and Islamabad police have submitted their responses, the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) and Balochistan police have yet to do so. The court has issued fresh notices to these agencies, requiring their responses by Monday, thus postponing the case until then.

Bushra Bibi’s implication in these cases marks a critical juncture in the ongoing investigations into various high-profile incidents of violence and arson. The accusations against her, especially concerning the GHQ attack, underscore the gravity of the charges and the high stakes involved.

This development also comes amidst broader political and legal challenges faced by the former Prime Minister and his associates. The court’s insistence on detailed submissions from all relevant agencies highlights the thoroughness required in handling such sensitive cases.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *